On 15 January 2015 at 18:33, Stephen Warren <swar...@wwwdotorg.org> wrote:
> On 01/15/2015 09:12 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.viz...@collabora.com>
>
>
> Ah, having read the explanation in the next patch, I think ...
>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc,pwrseq-simple.txt
>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc,pwrseq-simple.txt
>
>
>> +- delay : delay to wait after driving the reset gpio active [ms].
>
>
> ... delay is the wrong name. reset-pulse-width or reset-pulse-length would
> be better. delay sounds like a delay after resetting the device before it
> can be accessed.

I agree with Stephen's proposal.

This patch needs to be rebased and retested on latest version the
mmc-pwrseq patches. Moreover, if you think the patchset which $subject
patch is a part of is material for 3.20, I will need to share an
immutable branch with the mmc-pwrseq patches for ARM SOC to pull in,
tell me if you need that.

Kind regards
Uffe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to