> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:linux-mmc-
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Wolfram Sang
> Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 3:04 PM
> To: Huang Changming-R66093
> Cc: [email protected]; Huang Changming-R66093; Gao Guanhua-B22826
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] ESDHC: add PIO mode support
> 
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 10:19:37AM +0800, [email protected] wrote:
> > From: Jerry Huang <[email protected]>
> >
> > For some FSL ESDHC controller(e.g. P2020E, Rev1.0), the SDHC can not
> > work on DMA mode because of the hardware bug, so we set a broken dma
> > flag and use PIO mode.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gao Guanhua <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Jerry Huang <[email protected]>
> 
> NACK for the series
> 
> 1) If you introduce a new property you always have to document the
> binding which is missing. But you don't need to write it because...
I will document them.

> 2) ... the aproach seems wrong to me. The quirks should be set depending
> on the compatible entry, e.g. if compatible == "this_controller" then
> quirks |= whatever_needed. Or?
> 
The quirk will not be set only depending on the compatible entry, the property 
entry can be, too.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to