Hi Mauro,
Thank you for the patch.
On Sunday 06 September 2015 09:03:04 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Add a new ioctl that will report the entire topology on
> one go.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mche...@osg.samsung.com>
>
> diff --git a/include/media/media-entity.h b/include/media/media-entity.h
> index 7320cdc45833..2d5ad40254b7 100644
> --- a/include/media/media-entity.h
> +++ b/include/media/media-entity.h
> @@ -181,6 +181,8 @@ struct media_interface {
> */
> struct media_intf_devnode {
> struct media_interface intf;
> +
> + /* Should match the fields at media_v2_intf_devnode */
> u32 major;
> u32 minor;
> };
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/media.h b/include/uapi/linux/media.h
> index a1bd7afba110..b17f6763aff4 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/media.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/media.h
> @@ -206,6 +206,10 @@ struct media_pad_desc {
> #define MEDIA_LNK_FL_IMMUTABLE (1 << 1)
> #define MEDIA_LNK_FL_DYNAMIC (1 << 2)
>
> +#define MEDIA_LNK_FL_LINK_TYPE (0xf << 28)
> +# define MEDIA_LNK_FL_DATA_LINK (0 << 28)
> +# define MEDIA_LNK_FL_INTERFACE_LINK (1 << 28)
> +
> struct media_link_desc {
> struct media_pad_desc source;
> struct media_pad_desc sink;
> @@ -249,11 +253,93 @@ struct media_links_enum {
> #define MEDIA_INTF_T_ALSA_RAWMIDI (MEDIA_INTF_T_ALSA_BASE + 4)
> #define MEDIA_INTF_T_ALSA_HWDEP (MEDIA_INTF_T_ALSA_BASE + 5)
>
> -/* TBD: declare the structs needed for the new G_TOPOLOGY ioctl */
> +/*
> + * MC next gen API definitions
> + *
> + * NOTE: The declarations below are close to the MC RFC for the Media
> + * Controller, the next generation. Yet, there are a few adjustments
> + * to do, as we want to be able to have a functional API before
> + * the MC properties change. Those will be properly marked below.
> + * Please also notice that I removed "num_pads", "num_links",
> + * from the proposal, as a proper userspace application will likely
> + * use lists for pads/links, just as we intend to do in Kernelspace.
> + * The API definition should be freed from fields that are bound to
> + * some specific data structure.
> + *
> + * FIXME: Currently, I opted to name the new types as "media_v2", as this
> + * won't cause any conflict with the Kernelspace namespace, nor with
> + * the previous kAPI media_*_desc namespace. This can be changed
> + * later, before the adding this API upstream.
Yes, that's a good idea. Or at least we need to remove this comment if we
decide to keep the v2 names :-)
> + */
> +
> +
> +struct media_v2_entity {
> + __u32 id;
> + char name[64]; /* FIXME: move to a property? (RFC says so) */
I agree with Sakari that we can keep the name here even if we also expose it
as a property. However, there's one issue we need to address : we need to
clearly define what the name field should contain and how it should be
constructed, otherwise we'll end up with the exact same mess as today, and I
don't want that. We can discuss it in this mail thread or as replies to a
future documentation patch.
> + __u16 reserved[14];
Sakari and Hans have already commented on using __u32 instead of __u16 for
reserved fields, as well as on the number of reserved fields. I agree with
them but have nothing to add.
> +};
> +
> +/* Should match the specific fields at media_intf_devnode */
> +struct media_v2_intf_devnode {
> + __u32 major;
> + __u32 minor;
> +};
> +
> +struct media_v2_interface {
> + __u32 id;
> + __u32 intf_type;
> + __u32 flags;
> + __u32 reserved[9];
> +
> + union {
> + struct media_v2_intf_devnode devnode;
> + __u32 raw[16];
> + };
> +};
> +
> +struct media_v2_pad {
> + __u32 id;
> + __u32 entity_id;
> + __u32 flags;
> + __u16 reserved[9];
> +};
> +
> +struct media_v2_link {
> + __u32 id;
> + __u32 source_id;
> + __u32 sink_id;
> + __u32 flags;
> + __u32 reserved[5];
> +};
> +
> +struct media_v2_topology {
> + __u32 topology_version;
> +
> + __u32 num_entities;
> + struct media_v2_entity *entities;
The kernel seems to be moving to using __u64 instead of pointers in userspace-
facing structures to avoid compat32 code.
> +
> + __u32 num_interfaces;
> + struct media_v2_interface *interfaces;
> +
> + __u32 num_pads;
> + struct media_v2_pad *pads;
> +
> + __u32 num_links;
> + struct media_v2_link *links;
> +
> + struct {
> + __u32 reserved_num;
> + void *reserved_ptr;
> + } reserved_types[16];
> + __u32 reserved[8];
I'd just create __u32 reserved fields without any reserved_types, we can
always use the reserved fields to add new types later.
> +};
> +
> +/* ioctls */
>
> #define MEDIA_IOC_DEVICE_INFO _IOWR('|', 0x00, struct
media_device_info)
> #define MEDIA_IOC_ENUM_ENTITIES _IOWR('|', 0x01, struct
media_entity_desc)
> #define MEDIA_IOC_ENUM_LINKS _IOWR('|', 0x02, struct
> media_links_enum)
> #define MEDIA_IOC_SETUP_LINK _IOWR('|', 0x03, struct media_link_desc)
> +#define MEDIA_IOC_G_TOPOLOGY _IOWR('|', 0x04, struct
> media_v2_topology)
>
> #endif /* __LINUX_MEDIA_H */
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
