On Tue 2015-09-29 09:26:27, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> Hi Pavel,
>
> Thanks for the review.
>
> On 09/28/2015 10:37 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >On Mon 2015-09-28 15:07:21, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> >>LED subsystem shifted responsibility for choosing between SYNC or ASYNC
> >>way of setting brightness from drivers to the caller. Adapt the wrapper
> >>to those changes.
> >
> >Umm. Maybe right patch, but wrong position in the queue, no?
> >
> >If I understand changelog correctly, LED flashes will be subtly broken
> >before this patch is applied.
> >
> >I guess this patch should be moved sooner so everything works at each
> >position in bisect...?
>
> Moving it wouldn't improve anything. It would have to be merged with
> patch 7/12 [1]. However, as you mentioned, LED flashes before this
> patch will be broken only subtly, i.e. torch brightness will be set
> from a work queue task and not synchronously. It would be barely
> noticeable. Nonetheless, I can merge the patches in the next
> version of the patch set.
Ok, flash firing a tiny bit later is probably not huge problem. I
guess it is best to leave the patches as is.
Best regards,
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
