Hi, Recently, while testing reduced blanking implementation, I came across few differences between the results produced by cvt, gtf modeline implementation and results given by standards spreadsheet. The resultant timing differences were minor and seen only for few input combinations. However, it would be good to have it fixed. Please find the fixes for the same.
Regards, Prashant Prashant Laddha (3): v4l2-utils: handle interlace fraction correctly in gtf v4l2-utils gtf: use round instead of roundown for v_lines_rnd v4l2-utils: fix pixel clock calc for cvt reduced blanking utils/v4l2-ctl/v4l2-ctl-modes.cpp | 34 ++++++++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) -- 1.9.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
