On Sun January 6 2013 13:41:57 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Sun, 06 Jan 2013 13:34:53 +0100
> Sylwester Nawrocki <sylvester.nawro...@gmail.com> escreveu:
> 
> > On 01/06/2013 12:32 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > > Em Fri, 04 Jan 2013 23:39:12 +0100
> > > Sylwester Nawrocki<sylvester.nawro...@gmail.com>  escreveu:
> > >
> > >
> > >>> Tomasz Stanislawski (1):
> > >>>         s5p-tv: mixer: fix handling of VIDIOC_S_FMT
> > >
> > > I'll drop this one for now. Devin raised a point: such changes would break
> > > existing applications.
> > >
> > > So, we'll need to revisit this topic before changing the drivers.
> > >
> > > Btw, I failed to find the corresponding patch at patchwork:
> > >   
> > > http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/project/linux-media/list/?state=*&q=VIDIOC_S_FMT
> > >
> > > So, its status update may be wrong after flushing your pwclient commands.
> > 
> > Hmm, I got this patch from Tomasz by e-mail and added it to the pull 
> > request.
> > I think it wasn't sent to the mailing list, but I noticed it only after
> > sending you the pull requests, when was preparing the pwclient commands.
> > I've just posted it now, sorry. The link is here:
> > http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/16143
> > 
> > Tomasz created this patch specifically for the purpose of format negotiation
> > in video pipeline in the application we used to test various scenarios with
> > DMABUF. I agree this patch has a potential of breaking buggy user space
> > applications. I can't see other solution for it right now, there seems even
> > to be no possibility to return some flag in VIDIOC_S_FMT indicating that
> > format has been modified and is valid, when -EINVAL was returned. This 
> > sounds
> > ugly anyway, but could ensure backward compatibility for applications that
> > exppect EINVAL when format has been changed. BTW, I wonder if it is only 
> > fourcc,
> > or other format parameters as well - like width, height, some applications
> > expect to get EINVAL when those have changed.
> 
> The patch makes the driver compliant to v4l-compilance, as its behavior asks
> for such change, after some discussions we had this year in San Diego. At that
> time, we all believed that such change were safe.
> 
> However, we can't do it like proposed there (and on other patches from Hans).
> 
> The fact is that tvtime and mythtv applications (maybe more) will fail 
> if the returned format is different than the requested ones, as they 
> don't check for the returned value.
> 
> As no regressions on userspace are allowed, we need to re-discuss this issue.
> 
> While this doesn't happen, I'll postpone such patches.

This is a video output device. So this patch will never affect 
tvtime/mythtv/etc.
I have no problem with this change being merged.

Regards,

        Hans

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to