Em Mon, 13 Aug 2012 19:43:29 +0530
Manjunath Hadli <manjunath.ha...@ti.com> escreveu:
> Hi Dror,
>
> Thanks for the patch.
>
> Mauro,
>
> I'll queue this patch for v3.7 through my tree.
Sure.
>
> On Thursday 09 August 2012 12:03 PM, Dror Cohen wrote:
> > This patch address the issue that a function named config_vpif_params should
> > be vpif_config_params. However this name is shared with two structures
> > defined
> > already. So I changed the structures to config_vpif_params (origin was
> > vpif_config_params)
> >
> > v2 changes: softer wording in description and the structs are now
> > defined without _t
Hmm... I didn't understand what you're wanting with this change. Before this
patch,
there are:
v4l@pedra ~/v4l/patchwork $ git grep config_vpif_params
drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif.c:/* config_vpif_params
drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif.c:static void config_vpif_params(struct
vpif_params *vpifparams,
drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif.c: config_vpif_params(vpifparams,
channel_id, found);
v4l@pedra ~/v4l/patchwork $ git grep vpif_config_params
drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c:static struct vpif_config_params
config_params = {
drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.h:struct vpif_config_params {
drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_display.c:static struct vpif_config_params
config_params = {
drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_display.h:struct vpif_config_params {
After that, there are:
v4l@pedra ~/v4l/patchwork $ git grep vpif_config_params
drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif.c:/* vpif_config_params
drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif.c:static void vpif_config_params(struct
vpif_params *vpifparams,
drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif.c: vpif_config_params(vpifparams,
channel_id, found);
v4l@pedra ~/v4l/patchwork $ git grep config_vpif_params
drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c:static struct config_vpif_params
config_params = {
drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.h:struct config_vpif_params {
drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_display.c:static struct config_vpif_params
config_params = {
drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_display.h:struct config_vpif_params {
So, I can't really see any improvement on avoiding duplicate names.
IMHO, the better would be to name those functions as:
vpif: vpif_config_params (or, even better, vpif_core_config_params)
vpif_capture: vpif_capture_config_params
vpif_display: vpif_display_config_params
This way, duplication will be avoided and will avoid the confusing inversion
between
vpif and config.
Regards,
Mauro
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
