On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 05:50:54PM +0200, Peter Senna Tschudin wrote:
> Marcos,
> 
> > Now that you removed this kfree, you could remove this label too. Very
> > nice your cleanup :)
> Thanks!
> 
> >
> >>  vpbe_fail_sd_register:
> >>         kfree(vpbe_dev->encoders);
> >>  vpbe_fail_v4l2_device:
> 
> The problem removing the label is that it will require some more work
> naming the labels. See:
> if (!vpbe_dev->amp) {
> ...
>       goto vpbe_fail_amp_register;
> 
> If I just remove the label vpbe_fail_amp_register, the label names
> will not make sense any more as the next label is
> vpbe_fail_sd_register. So I will need to change the name to something
> different or rename all labels to out1, out2, out3 or err1, err2,
> err3, or ....
> 
> Any suggestions?

Labal names should not be numbers because this is not GW-BASIC.  The
label should reflect what happens on the next line.  Labeling the
place after the goto location where you started from is always
nonsense.

regards,
dan carpenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to