On Thu 26 July 2012 16:28:20 Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> Hi Konke,
>
> > +
> > +libv4l2rds_la_SOURCES = libv4l2rds.c
> > +libv4l2rds_la_CPPFLAGS = -fvisibility=hidden $(ENFORCE_LIBV4L_STATIC)
> > -std=c99
> > +libv4l2rds_la_LDFLAGS = -version-info 0 -lpthread $(DLOPEN_LIBS)
> > $(ENFORCE_LIBV4L_STATIC)
> > diff --git a/lib/libv4l2rds/libv4l2rds.c b/lib/libv4l2rds/libv4l2rds.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..0bacaa2
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/lib/libv4l2rds/libv4l2rds.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,871 @@
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright 2012 Cisco Systems, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights
> > reserved.
> [snip]
> > + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>
> Just a -probably silly- question...
>
> How can it be "free software" yet claim "All rights reserved" ? Is this
> correct?
Yeah, it's correct. I had the same question when I was told that this was the
correct phrase to use. Check other copyright lines in the kernel and you'll see
the same line.
Since it is covered by the LGPLv2 license there aren't many rights to reserve
:-)
The only right there is in practice is the right to decide whether or not to
allow other licenses as well.
Regards,
Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
