On Thu July 19 2012 20:41:11 Ismael Luceno wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 10:25:09 -0300
> Ezequiel Garcia <elezegar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Ismael Luceno
> > <ismael.luc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Ezequiel Garcia
> > > <elezegar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> This patch moves video_nr module parameter to core.c
> > >> and then passes that parameter as an argument to functions
> > >> that need it.
> > >> This way we avoid the extern declaration and parameter
> > >> dependencies are better exposed.
> > > <...>
> > >
> > > NACK.
> > >
> > > The changes to video_nr are supposed to be preserved.
> > 
> > Mmm, I'm sorry but I don't see any functionality change in this patch,
> > just a cleanup.
> > 
> > What do you mean by "changes to video_nr are supposed to be
> > preserved"?
> 
> It is modified by solo_enc_alloc, which is called multiple times by
> solo_enc_v4l2_init.

You don't need to modify it at all. video_register_device() will start
looking for a free video node number starting at video_nr and counting
upwards, so increasing video_nr has no purpose. Leaving it out will give
you exactly the same result.

The only driver that does the same thing is vivi, and I think it should
be removed from there as well. The solo driver probably copied it from
vivi :-(

Regards,

        Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to