Powering off a device is a "best effort" task: failure to execute one of
the steps should not prevent the next steps to be executed. For
instance, an I2C communication error when putting the chip in stand-by
mode should not prevent the more agressive next step of turning the
chip's power supply off.

Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com>
---
 drivers/media/video/soc_camera.c |    9 +++------
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/media/video/soc_camera.c b/drivers/media/video/soc_camera.c
index 55b981f..bbd518f 100644
--- a/drivers/media/video/soc_camera.c
+++ b/drivers/media/video/soc_camera.c
@@ -89,18 +89,15 @@ static int soc_camera_power_off(struct soc_camera_device 
*icd,
                                struct soc_camera_link *icl)
 {
        struct v4l2_subdev *sd = soc_camera_to_subdev(icd);
-       int ret = v4l2_subdev_call(sd, core, s_power, 0);
+       int ret;
 
-       if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENOIOCTLCMD && ret != -ENODEV)
-               return ret;
+       v4l2_subdev_call(sd, core, s_power, 0);
 
        if (icl->power) {
                ret = icl->power(icd->control, 0);
-               if (ret < 0) {
+               if (ret < 0)
                        dev_err(icd->pdev,
                                "Platform failed to power-off the camera.\n");
-                       return ret;
-               }
        }
 
        ret = regulator_bulk_disable(icl->num_regulators,
-- 
1.7.8.6

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to