Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 21:45 -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> Would some of these patches (e.g., at least patches 1, 2, and 5) be
>> appropriate for inclusion in the 3.0.y and 3.2.y stable kernels from
>> kernel.org?
>
> Assuming they haven't caused any regressions, I think everything except
> 9b98d6067971 (4/5) would be appropriate.
Great. Here are the aforementioned patches rebased against 3.0.y, in
the hope that some interested person can confirm they still work. The
only backporting needed was to adjust to the lack of
drivers/staging/lirc -> drivers/staging/media/lirc renaming.
Ben Hutchings (4):
[media] staging: lirc_serial: Fix init/exit order
[media] staging: lirc_serial: Free resources on failure paths of
lirc_serial_probe()
[media] staging: lirc_serial: Fix deadlock on resume failure
[media] staging: lirc_serial: Do not assume error codes returned by
request_irq()
drivers/staging/lirc/lirc_serial.c | 100 +++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
