Hi Guennadi,

>> I suggest you hold on this patch until the new series is accepted and
>> then merge both at the same time.
>>
>> What do you think?
>
> Ok, I'll be reviewing that patch series hopefully soon, and in principle
> it is good, that the buffer counting will really be fixed in it, but in an
> ideal world it would be better to have this your patch merged into patch
> 2/4 of the series, agree? Would I be asking too much of you if I suggest
> that? Feel free to explain why this wouldn't work or just reject if you're
> just too tight on schedule. I'll see ifI can swallow it that way or maybe
> merge myself :-)

If you, Sascha, or someone else comes up with some requests or fixes
to the new series I don't mind to rebase it so you can just ignore
this patch, since I would have to sent a v2 version of the series
anyway.

Regards.

-- 
Javier Martin
Vista Silicon S.L.
CDTUC - FASE C - Oficina S-345
Avda de los Castros s/n
39005- Santander. Cantabria. Spain
+34 942 25 32 60
www.vista-silicon.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to