On Tue, 17 Jan 2012, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Em 17-01-2012 08:16, Guennadi Liakhovetski escreveu: > > Hi Hans > > > > On Tue, 17 Jan 2012, Hans Verkuil wrote: > > > >> On Monday 16 January 2012 23:16:31 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > >>> On Mon, 16 Jan 2012, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > >>>> This is an automatic generated email to let you know that the following > >>>> patch were queued at the http://git.linuxtv.org/media_tree.git tree: > >>>> > >>>> Subject: [media] V4L2 Spec: improve the G/S_INPUT/OUTPUT documentation > >>>> Author: Hans Verkuil <hans.verk...@cisco.com> > >>>> Date: Wed Jan 11 07:37:54 2012 -0300 > >>> > >>> [snip] > >>> > >>>> diff --git a/Documentation/DocBook/media/v4l/vidioc-g-output.xml > >>>> b/Documentation/DocBook/media/v4l/vidioc-g-output.xml index > >>>> fd45f1c..4533068 100644 > >>>> --- a/Documentation/DocBook/media/v4l/vidioc-g-output.xml > >>>> +++ b/Documentation/DocBook/media/v4l/vidioc-g-output.xml > >>>> @@ -61,8 +61,9 @@ desired output in an integer and call the > >>>> > >>>> <constant>VIDIOC_S_OUTPUT</constant> ioctl with a pointer to this > >>>> integer. Side effects are possible. For example outputs may support > >>>> different video standards, so the driver may implicitly switch the > >>>> current > >>>> > >>>> -standard. It is good practice to select an output before querying or > >>>> -negotiating any other parameters.</para> > >>>> +standard. > >>>> +standard. Because of these possible side effects applications > >>>> +must select an output before querying or negotiating any other > >>>> parameters.</para> > >>> > >>> something seems to be wrong here. > >> > >> Hi Guennadi! > >> > >> What's wrong here? I've no idea what you mean. > > > >>>> +standard. > >>>> +standard. Because of these possible side effects applications > > > > doesn't seem to make much sense? > > Are you referring to grammar?
Sorry, am I being blind? The above seems to produce <quote> different video standards, so the driver may implicitly switch the current standard. standard. Because of these possible side effects applications </quote> i.e., double "standard." - one too many. Thanks Guennadi > I think that a comma is missing there [1]: > > Because of these possible side effects, applications > must select an output before querying or negotiating any other > parameters. > > IMO, reverting the order of the explanation clause is semantically better, > as it bolds the need to select an output, and put the phrase at the > cause-effect order: > > Applications must select an output before querying or negotiating > any other parameters, because of these possible side effects. > > But this is really a matter of choice. In any case, except for the > comma, that makes sense for me. > > [1] Rule 4 of http://grammar.ccc.commnet.edu/grammar/commas.htm > > > Regards, > Mauro > --- Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D. Freelance Open-Source Software Developer http://www.open-technology.de/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
