That question is related to that kind of indentation generally, not only
that patch.
On 12/06/2011 03:39 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
Function parameters on subsequent lines should never be aligned with the
function name but rather be indented.
[...]
usb_set_interface(dev->udev,
- dev->isoc_in.bInterfaceNumber,
- 0);
+ dev->isoc_in.bInterfaceNumber, 0);
Which kind of indentation should be used when function params are
slitted to multiple lines?
In that case two tabs are used (related to function indentation).
example:
ret= function(param1,
param2);
Other generally used is only one tab (related to function indentation).
example:
ret= function(param1,
param2);
And last generally used is multiple tabs + spaces until same location
where first param is meet (related to function indentation). I see that
bad since use of tabs, with only spaces I see it fine. And this many
times leads situation param level are actually different whilst
originally idea was to put those same level.
example:
ret= function(param1,
param2);
regards
Antti
--
http://palosaari.fi/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
