On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 10:48:46 -0700, Dave Hansen <d...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 10:26 -0700, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
> You can do this in a more general fashion by checking the
> zone boundaries and resolving the pfn->page every MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES.
> That will not be SPARSEMEM specific.
I've tried doing stuff that way but it ended up with much more code.
I guess instead of:
+static inline bool zone_pfn_same_memmap(unsigned long pfn1, unsigned long pfn2)
+{
+ return pfn_to_section_nr(pfn1) == pfn_to_section_nr(pfn2);
+}
You could do:
static inline bool zone_pfn_same_maxorder(unsigned long pfn1, unsigned long
pfn2)
{
unsigned long mask = MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES-1;
return (pfn1 & mask) == (pfn2 & mask);
}
I think that works. Should be the same code you have now, basically.
Makes sense. It'd require calling pfn_to_page() every MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES even
in memory models that have linear mapping of struct page, but I guess that's
not that bad.
--
Best regards, _ _
.o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science, Michał “mina86” Nazarewicz (o o)
ooo +----<email/xmpp: m...@google.com>--------------ooO--(_)--Ooo--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
