Em 25-09-2011 16:28, Chris Rankin escreveu: > --- On Sun, 25/9/11, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mche...@redhat.com> wrote: >> Ok, I've applied it, but it doesn't sound a good idea to me >> to do: >> >> + mutex_unlock(&dev->lock); >> em28xx_init_extension(dev); >> + mutex_lock(&dev->lock); >> > > Yes, I suppose it's the logical equivalent of moving the > em28xx_init_extension(dev) call from em28xx_init_dev(), and placing it > immediately after the final mutex_unlock(&dev->lock) call in > em28xx_usb_probe() instead. Which would be cleaner, quite frankly. > > Which stage of the v4l2 initialisation triggers the race with udev? > v4l2_device_register()?
Yes. Just after creating a device, udev tries to access it. This bug is more sensitive on multi-CPU machines, as udev may run on another CPU. > > Cheers, > Chris > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
