On Monday 27 June 2011, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > The point is that the spec can easily be improved to make such 'NOP'
> > operations
> > explicit, or to require that if a capability is present, then the
> > corresponding
> > ioctl(s) must also be present. Things like that are easy to verify as well
> > with
> > v4l2-compliance.
>
> We currently have more than 64 ioctl's. Adding a capability bit for each
> doesn't
> seem the right thing to do. Ok, some could be grouped, but, even so, there are
> drivers that implement the VIDIOC_G, but doesn't implement the corresponding
> VIDIO_S.
> So, I think we don't have enough available bits for doing that.
It shouldn't be too hard to do an ioctl command that returns a le_bitmask with
the
ioctl command number as an index (0 to 91, currently), and the bit set for each
command that has the corresponding v4l2_ioctl_ops member filled for the device.
That would be an obvious way to query the operations, but I don't know if it's
useful.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
