I noticed that the second part of this conditional is always true.
Would the intention be to strictly check on both chip_major and
chip_minor?

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Kaiser <ni...@nikai.net>
---
 drivers/media/IR/nuvoton-cir.c |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/media/IR/nuvoton-cir.c b/drivers/media/IR/nuvoton-cir.c
index 301be53..896463b 100644
--- a/drivers/media/IR/nuvoton-cir.c
+++ b/drivers/media/IR/nuvoton-cir.c
@@ -249,8 +249,8 @@ static int nvt_hw_detect(struct nvt_dev *nvt)
        chip_minor = nvt_cr_read(nvt, CR_CHIP_ID_LO);
        nvt_dbg("%s: chip id: 0x%02x 0x%02x", chip_id, chip_major, chip_minor);
 
-       if (chip_major != CHIP_ID_HIGH &&
-           (chip_minor != CHIP_ID_LOW || chip_minor != CHIP_ID_LOW2))
+       if (chip_major != CHIP_ID_HIGH ||
+           (chip_minor != CHIP_ID_LOW && chip_minor != CHIP_ID_LOW2))
                ret = -ENODEV;
 
        nvt_efm_disable(nvt);
-- 
1.7.2.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to