On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 11:45:58 +0200 (CEST) Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovet...@gmx.de> wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Aug 2010, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > > > Why can't you revert a commit that causes the regression? > > See this reply, and the complete thread too. > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-sh&m=128130485208262&w=2 > > > The related DMA API wasn't changed in 2.6.36-rc1. The DMA API is not > > responsible for the regression. And the patchset even exnteds the > > definition of the DMA API (dma_declare_coherent_memory). Such change > > shouldn't applied after rc1. I think that DMA-API.txt says that > > dma_declare_coherent_memory() handles coherent memory for a particular > > device. It's not for the API that reserves coherent memory that can be > > used for any device for a single device. > > Anyway, we need a way to fix the regression. Needs to find a different way. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
