Hi Luis,
Thank you for the patch.
On Friday, 19 October 2018 15:52:23 EET Luis Oliveira wrote:
> Add device-tree bindings documentation for SNPS DesignWare MIPI D-PHY in
> RX mode.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luis Oliveira <loli...@synopsys.com>
> ---
> Changelog
> v2-V3
> - removed gpios reference - it was for a separated driver
> - changed address to show complete address
>
> .../devicetree/bindings/phy/snps,dphy-rx.txt | 28 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/snps,dphy-rx.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/snps,dphy-rx.txt
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/snps,dphy-rx.txt new file mode
> 100644
> index 0000000..03d17ab
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/snps,dphy-rx.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
> +Synopsys DesignWare MIPI Rx D-PHY block details
> +
> +Description
> +-----------
> +
> +The Synopsys MIPI D-PHY controller supports MIPI-DPHY in receiver mode.
> +Please refer to phy-bindings.txt for more information.
> +
> +Required properties:
> +- compatible : Shall be "snps,dphy-rx".
> +- #phy-cells : Must be 1.
> +- snps,dphy-frequency : Output frequency of the D-PHY.
You replied to my review of v2 that you would remove this property. Is this an
oversight ?
> +- snps,dphy-te-len : Size of the communication interface (8 bits->8 or
> 12bits->12).
> +- reg : Physical base address and size of the device
> memory mapped
> + registers;
Please document the ranges.
> +Example:
> +
> + mipi_dphy_rx1: dphy@d00003040 {
> + compatible = "snps,dphy-rx";
> + #phy-cells = <1>;
> + snps,dphy-frequency = <300000>;
> + snps,dphy-te-len = <12>;
> + reg = < 0xd0003040 0x20
> + 0xd0008000 0x100
> + 0xd0009000 0x100>;
> + };
> +
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
