Em Fri, 3 Aug 2018 15:34:26 +0300
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ai...@iki.fi> escreveu:

> > Still thinking out loud, the fact that we can't change the size of the 
> > structures pointed to by media_v2_topology bothers me. We could add a 
> > version 
> > field to media_v2_topology that would be set by applications to tell the 
> > kernel which version of the API they expect. On the other hand, maybe we'll 
> > just do a media_v3_topology when the need arises...  
> 
> What you could to is to allocate another field for the new struct; we're
> entirely free to put whatever we want there, and the kernel would simply
> need to convert between the two. Not ideal though. Another option would be to
> explicitly convey the struct size as for the IOCTL argument itself. Both
> should probably be used sparingly.

The idea we had at the MC workshop is that anything else would be mapped
via the properties API.

So, the per-type structs will be kept on a minimal format.


Thanks,
Mauro

Reply via email to