Em Sun, 25 Feb 2018 13:31:36 +0100
Daniel Scheller <d.scheller....@gmail.com> escreveu:

> From: Daniel Scheller <d.schel...@gmx.net>
> 
> The I2C adapter evaluation (based on chan->number) is duplicated at
> several places (tuner_attach_() functions, demod_attach_stv0900() and
> cineS2_probe()). Clean this up by wrapping that construct in a separate
> function which all users of that can pass the ngene_channel pointer and
> get the correct I2C adapter from.

This patch doesn't apply. 

Please rebase from this point at the top of the media tree.

PS.: Perhaps I ended by merging an older version of some of your
patches, as I noticed that some e-mails got lost either by me or
by patch work along those days.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Scheller <d.schel...@gmx.net>
> ---
>  drivers/media/pci/ngene/ngene-cards.c | 41 
> +++++++++++++----------------------
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/pci/ngene/ngene-cards.c 
> b/drivers/media/pci/ngene/ngene-cards.c
> index 00b100660784..dff55c7c9f86 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/pci/ngene/ngene-cards.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/pci/ngene/ngene-cards.c
> @@ -118,17 +118,25 @@ static int i2c_read_reg(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, u8 
> adr, u8 reg, u8 *val)
>  /* Demod/tuner attachment 
> ***************************************************/
>  
> /****************************************************************************/
>  
> +static struct i2c_adapter *i2c_adapter_from_chan(struct ngene_channel *chan)
> +{
> +     /* tuner 1+2: i2c adapter #0, tuner 3+4: i2c adapter #1 */
> +     if (chan->number < 2)
> +             return &chan->dev->channel[0].i2c_adapter;
> +
> +     return &chan->dev->channel[1].i2c_adapter;
> +}
> +
>  static int tuner_attach_stv6110(struct ngene_channel *chan)
>  {
>       struct device *pdev = &chan->dev->pci_dev->dev;
> -     struct i2c_adapter *i2c;
> +     struct i2c_adapter *i2c = i2c_adapter_from_chan(chan);
>       struct stv090x_config *feconf = (struct stv090x_config *)
>               chan->dev->card_info->fe_config[chan->number];
>       struct stv6110x_config *tunerconf = (struct stv6110x_config *)
>               chan->dev->card_info->tuner_config[chan->number];
>       const struct stv6110x_devctl *ctl;
>  
> -     /* tuner 1+2: i2c adapter #0, tuner 3+4: i2c adapter #1 */
>       if (chan->number < 2)
>               i2c = &chan->dev->channel[0].i2c_adapter;
>       else
> @@ -158,16 +166,10 @@ static int tuner_attach_stv6110(struct ngene_channel 
> *chan)
>  static int tuner_attach_stv6111(struct ngene_channel *chan)
>  {
>       struct device *pdev = &chan->dev->pci_dev->dev;
> -     struct i2c_adapter *i2c;
> +     struct i2c_adapter *i2c = i2c_adapter_from_chan(chan);
>       struct dvb_frontend *fe;
>       u8 adr = 4 + ((chan->number & 1) ? 0x63 : 0x60);
>  
> -     /* tuner 1+2: i2c adapter #0, tuner 3+4: i2c adapter #1 */
> -     if (chan->number < 2)
> -             i2c = &chan->dev->channel[0].i2c_adapter;
> -     else
> -             i2c = &chan->dev->channel[1].i2c_adapter;
> -
>       fe = dvb_attach(stv6111_attach, chan->fe, i2c, adr);
>       if (!fe) {
>               fe = dvb_attach(stv6111_attach, chan->fe, i2c, adr & ~4);
> @@ -197,10 +199,9 @@ static int drxk_gate_ctrl(struct dvb_frontend *fe, int 
> enable)
>  static int tuner_attach_tda18271(struct ngene_channel *chan)
>  {
>       struct device *pdev = &chan->dev->pci_dev->dev;
> -     struct i2c_adapter *i2c;
> +     struct i2c_adapter *i2c = i2c_adapter_from_chan(chan);
>       struct dvb_frontend *fe;
>  
> -     i2c = &chan->dev->channel[0].i2c_adapter;
>       if (chan->fe->ops.i2c_gate_ctrl)
>               chan->fe->ops.i2c_gate_ctrl(chan->fe, 1);
>       fe = dvb_attach(tda18271c2dd_attach, chan->fe, i2c, 0x60);
> @@ -240,7 +241,7 @@ static int tuner_tda18212_ping(struct ngene_channel *chan,
>  static int tuner_attach_tda18212(struct ngene_channel *chan, u32 dmdtype)
>  {
>       struct device *pdev = &chan->dev->pci_dev->dev;
> -     struct i2c_adapter *i2c;
> +     struct i2c_adapter *i2c = i2c_adapter_from_chan(chan);
>       struct i2c_client *client;
>       struct tda18212_config config = {
>               .fe = chan->fe,
> @@ -262,12 +263,6 @@ static int tuner_attach_tda18212(struct ngene_channel 
> *chan, u32 dmdtype)
>       else
>               board_info.addr = 0x60;
>  
> -     /* tuner 1+2: i2c adapter #0, tuner 3+4: i2c adapter #1 */
> -     if (chan->number < 2)
> -             i2c = &chan->dev->channel[0].i2c_adapter;
> -     else
> -             i2c = &chan->dev->channel[1].i2c_adapter;
> -
>       /*
>        * due to a hardware quirk with the I2C gate on the stv0367+tda18212
>        * combo, the tda18212 must be probed by reading it's id _twice_ when
> @@ -320,7 +315,7 @@ static int tuner_attach_probe(struct ngene_channel *chan)
>  static int demod_attach_stv0900(struct ngene_channel *chan)
>  {
>       struct device *pdev = &chan->dev->pci_dev->dev;
> -     struct i2c_adapter *i2c;
> +     struct i2c_adapter *i2c = i2c_adapter_from_chan(chan);
>       struct stv090x_config *feconf = (struct stv090x_config *)
>               chan->dev->card_info->fe_config[chan->number];
>  
> @@ -620,7 +615,7 @@ static int port_has_xo2(struct i2c_adapter *i2c, u8 
> *type, u8 *id)
>  static int cineS2_probe(struct ngene_channel *chan)
>  {
>       struct device *pdev = &chan->dev->pci_dev->dev;
> -     struct i2c_adapter *i2c;
> +     struct i2c_adapter *i2c = i2c_adapter_from_chan(chan);
>       struct stv090x_config *fe_conf;
>       u8 buf[3];
>       u8 xo2_type, xo2_id, xo2_demodtype;
> @@ -628,12 +623,6 @@ static int cineS2_probe(struct ngene_channel *chan)
>       struct i2c_msg i2c_msg = { .flags = 0, .buf = buf };
>       int rc;
>  
> -     /* tuner 1+2: i2c adapter #0, tuner 3+4: i2c adapter #1 */
> -     if (chan->number < 2)
> -             i2c = &chan->dev->channel[0].i2c_adapter;
> -     else
> -             i2c = &chan->dev->channel[1].i2c_adapter;
> -
>       if (port_has_xo2(i2c, &xo2_type, &xo2_id)) {
>               xo2_id >>= 2;
>               dev_dbg(pdev, "XO2 on channel %d (type %d, id %d)\n",



Thanks,
Mauro

Reply via email to