Hi Hans, Thank you for the patch.
On Tuesday, 30 January 2018 12:27:00 EET Hans Verkuil wrote: > From: Hans Verkuil <hans.verk...@cisco.com> > > Some ioctls need to copy back the result even if the ioctl returned > an error. However, don't do this for the error code -ENOTTY. > It makes no sense in that cases. > > Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verk...@cisco.com> > Acked-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ai...@linux.intel.com> > Cc: <sta...@vger.kernel.org> # for v4.15 and up > --- > drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-compat-ioctl32.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-compat-ioctl32.c > b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-compat-ioctl32.c index > 7ee3777cbe9c..3a1fca1440ac 100644 > --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-compat-ioctl32.c > +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-compat-ioctl32.c > @@ -968,6 +968,9 @@ static long do_video_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned > int cmd, unsigned long ar set_fs(old_fs); > } > > + if (err == -ENOTTY) Should we also handle -ENOIOCTLCMD as in video_usercopy() ? > + return err; > + > /* Special case: even after an error we need to put the > results back for these ioctls since the error_idx will > contain information on which control failed. */ -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart
