Le vendredi 08 décembre 2017 à 14:38 +0530, Smitha T Murthy a écrit :
> Add V4L2 definition for HEVC compressed format
>
> Signed-off-by: Smitha T Murthy <smith...@samsung.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.ha...@samsung.com>
> Reviewed-by: Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.varba...@linaro.org>
> Acked-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verk...@cisco.com>
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/videodev2.h | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/videodev2.h b/include/uapi/linux/videodev2.h
> index 185d6a0..bd9b5d5 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/videodev2.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/videodev2.h
> @@ -634,6 +634,7 @@ struct v4l2_pix_format {
> #define V4L2_PIX_FMT_VC1_ANNEX_L v4l2_fourcc('V', 'C', '1', 'L') /* SMPTE
> 421M Annex L compliant stream */
> #define V4L2_PIX_FMT_VP8 v4l2_fourcc('V', 'P', '8', '0') /* VP8 */
> #define V4L2_PIX_FMT_VP9 v4l2_fourcc('V', 'P', '9', '0') /* VP9 */
> +#define V4L2_PIX_FMT_HEVC v4l2_fourcc('H', 'E', 'V', 'C') /* HEVC aka
> H.265 */
Wouldn't it be more consistent to call it V4L2_PIX_FMT_H265 as we have
used H264 for the previous generation, or is there a formal rationale ?
Also, this is byte-stream right ? With start codes ?
>
> /* Vendor-specific formats */
> #define V4L2_PIX_FMT_CPIA1 v4l2_fourcc('C', 'P', 'I', 'A') /* cpia1 YUV */
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
