Hi Sakari, > -----Original Message----- > From: Sakari Ailus [mailto:sakari.ai...@linux.intel.com] > Sent: Monday, November 06, 2017 3:38 PM > To: Mani, Rajmohan <rajmohan.m...@intel.com> > Cc: Zhi, Yong <yong....@intel.com>; linux-media@vger.kernel.org; Zheng, Jian > Xu <jian.xu.zh...@intel.com>; tf...@chromium.org; Toivonen, Tuukka > <tuukka.toivo...@intel.com>; Yang, Hyungwoo > <hyungwoo.y...@intel.com>; Rapolu, Chiranjeevi > <chiranjeevi.rap...@intel.com>; Hu, Jerry W <jerry.w...@intel.com>; > Vijaykumar, Ramya <ramya.vijayku...@intel.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] intel-ipu3: cio2: Add new MIPI-CSI2 driver > > Hi Rajmohan, > > On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 07:32:52PM +0000, Mani, Rajmohan wrote: > > Hi Sakari, Yong, > > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] intel-ipu3: cio2: Add new MIPI-CSI2 > > > driver > > > > > > Hi Yong, > > > > > > Thanks for the update! > > > > > > I took a final glance, there are a few matters that still need to be > > > addressed but then I think we're done. Please see below. > > > > > > Then we'll need an entry in the MAINTAINERS file in the kernel root > directory. > > > Could you add an entry for this driver in v8? > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 03:00:01PM -0500, Yong Zhi wrote: > > > ... > > > > +static int cio2_fbpt_rearrange(struct cio2_device *cio2, struct > > > > +cio2_queue *q) { > > > > + unsigned int i, j; > > > > + > > > > + for (i = 0, j = q->bufs_first; i < CIO2_MAX_BUFFERS; > > > > + i++, j = (j + 1) % CIO2_MAX_BUFFERS) > > > > + if (q->bufs[j]) > > > > + break; > > > > + > > > > + if (i == CIO2_MAX_BUFFERS) > > > > + return 0; > > > > > > You always return 0. The return type could be void. > > > > > > You could also move this function just above the function using it > > > (it's a single location). > > > > > > > + > > > > + if (j) { > > > > + arrange(q->fbpt, sizeof(struct cio2_fbpt_entry) * > > > CIO2_MAX_LOPS, > > > > + CIO2_MAX_BUFFERS, j); > > > > + arrange(q->bufs, sizeof(struct cio2_buffer *), > > > > + CIO2_MAX_BUFFERS, j); > > > > + } > > > > + > > > > + /* > > > > + * DMA clears the valid bit when accessing the buffer. > > > > + * When stopping stream in suspend callback, some of the buffers > > > > + * may be in invalid state. After resume, when DMA meets the > > > > invalid > > > > + * buffer, it will halt and stop receiving new data. > > > > + * To avoid DMA halting, set the valid bit for all buffers in > > > > FBPT. > > > > + */ > > > > + for (i = 0; i < CIO2_MAX_BUFFERS; i++) > > > > + cio2_fbpt_entry_enable(cio2, q->fbpt + i * > > > > CIO2_MAX_LOPS); > > > > + > > > > + return 0; > > > > +} > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > +static int cio2_vb2_start_streaming(struct vb2_queue *vq, > > > > +unsigned int count) { > > > > + struct cio2_queue *q = vb2q_to_cio2_queue(vq); > > > > + struct cio2_device *cio2 = vb2_get_drv_priv(vq); > > > > + int r; > > > > + > > > > + cio2->cur_queue = q; > > > > + atomic_set(&q->frame_sequence, 0); > > > > + > > > > + r = pm_runtime_get_sync(&cio2->pci_dev->dev); > > > > + if (r < 0) { > > > > + dev_info(&cio2->pci_dev->dev, "failed to set power > > > > %d\n", r); > > > > + pm_runtime_put(&cio2->pci_dev->dev); > > > > Shouldn't we use pm_runtime_put_noidle() here, so the usage_count gets > decremented? > > Yeah, pm_runtime_put_noidle() would be perhaps more appropriate. The > difference is that the noidle variant won't suspend the device (but it was > already suspended to begin with as resuming failed). >
Thanks for confirming. > > > > > > + return r; > > > > + } > > > > + > > > > + r = media_pipeline_start(&q->vdev.entity, &q->pipe); > > > > + if (r) > > > > + goto fail_pipeline; > > > > + > > > > + r = cio2_hw_init(cio2, q); > > > > + if (r) > > > > + goto fail_hw; > > > > + > > > > + /* Start streaming on sensor */ > > > > + r = v4l2_subdev_call(q->sensor, video, s_stream, 1); > > > > + if (r) > > > > + goto fail_csi2_subdev; > > > > + > > > > + cio2->streaming = true; > > > > + > > > > + return 0; > > > > + > > > > +fail_csi2_subdev: > > > > + cio2_hw_exit(cio2, q); > > > > +fail_hw: > > > > + media_pipeline_stop(&q->vdev.entity); > > > > +fail_pipeline: > > > > + dev_dbg(&cio2->pci_dev->dev, "failed to start streaming > > > > (%d)\n", r); > > > > + cio2_vb2_return_all_buffers(q); > > > > > > I believe there should be > > > > > > pm_runtime_put(&cio2->pci_dev->dev); > > > > > > here. You should also add a label and use goto from where you do > > > pm_runtime_put() in error handling in this function in order to make > > > this cleaner. > > > > > > > + > > > > + return r; > > > > +} > > > > > > -- > > > Kind regards, > > > > > > Sakari Ailus > > > sakari.ai...@linux.intel.com > > -- > Sakari Ailus > sakari.ai...@linux.intel.com
