Hi Philipp,

On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 06:00:47PM +0200, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> Currently the v4l2_async_notifier needs to be given a list of matches
> for all expected subdevices on creation. When chaining subdevices that
> are asynchronously probed via device tree, the bridge device that sets
> up the notifier does not know the complete list of subdevices, as it
> can only parse its own device tree node to obtain information about
> the nearest neighbor subdevices.
> To support indirectly connected subdevices, we need to support amending
> the existing notifier waiting list with newly found neighbor subdevices
> with each registered subdevice.
> 
> This can be achieved by adding new v42l_async_subdev matches to the
> notifier waiting list during the v4l2_subdev registered callback, which
> is called under the list lock from either v4l2_async_register_subdev or
> v4l2_async_notifier_register. For this purpose a new exported function
> __v4l2_async_notifier_add_subdev is added.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel <p.za...@pengutronix.de>
> ---
>  drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c | 78 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  include/media/v4l2-async.h           | 12 ++++++
>  2 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c 
> b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c
> index c4f1930..404eeea 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c
> @@ -109,6 +109,7 @@ static int v4l2_async_test_notify(struct 
> v4l2_async_notifier *notifier,
>               if (ret < 0)
>                       return ret;
>       }
> +
>       /* Move from the global subdevice list to notifier's done */
>       list_move(&sd->async_list, &notifier->done);
>  
> @@ -158,7 +159,7 @@ int v4l2_async_notifier_register(struct v4l2_device 
> *v4l2_dev,
>                                struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier)
>  {
>       struct v4l2_async_subdev *asd;
> -     int ret;
> +     struct list_head *tail;
>       int i;
>  
>       if (!notifier->num_subdevs || notifier->num_subdevs > V4L2_MAX_SUBDEVS)
> @@ -191,17 +192,71 @@ int v4l2_async_notifier_register(struct v4l2_device 
> *v4l2_dev,
>       /* Keep also completed notifiers on the list */
>       list_add(&notifier->list, &notifier_list);
>  
> +     do {
> +             int ret;
> +
> +             tail = notifier->waiting.prev;
> +
> +             ret = v4l2_async_test_notify_all(notifier);
> +             if (ret < 0) {
> +                     mutex_unlock(&list_lock);
> +                     return ret;
> +             }
> +
> +             /*
> +              * If entries were added to the notifier waiting list, check
> +              * again if the corresponding subdevices are already available.
> +              */
> +     } while (tail != notifier->waiting.prev);
> +
>       mutex_unlock(&list_lock);
>  
> -     return ret;
> +     return 0;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(v4l2_async_notifier_register);
>  
> +int __v4l2_async_notifier_add_subdev(struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier,
> +                                  struct v4l2_async_subdev *asd)
> +{
> +     struct v4l2_async_subdev *tmp_asd;
> +
> +     lockdep_assert_held(&list_lock);
> +
> +     if (asd->match_type != V4L2_ASYNC_MATCH_OF)
> +             return -EINVAL;
> +
> +     /*
> +      * First check if the same notifier is already on the waiting or done
> +      * lists. This can happen if a subdevice with multiple outputs is added
> +      * by all its downstream subdevices.
> +      */
> +     list_for_each_entry(tmp_asd, &notifier->waiting, list)
> +             if (tmp_asd->match.of.node == asd->match.of.node)
> +                     return 0;
> +     list_for_each_entry(tmp_asd, &notifier->done, list)
> +             if (tmp_asd->match.of.node == asd->match.of.node)
> +                     return 0;
> +
> +     /*
> +      * Add the new async subdev to the notifier waiting list, so
> +      * v4l2_async_belongs may use it to compare against entries in
> +      * subdev_list.
> +      * In case the subdev matching asd has already been passed in the
> +      * subdev_list walk in v4l2_async_notifier_register, or if
> +      * we are called from v4l2_async_register_subdev, the subdev_list
> +      * will have to be walked again.
> +      */
> +     list_add_tail(&asd->list, &notifier->waiting);
> +
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +
>  void v4l2_async_notifier_unregister(struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier)
>  {
>       struct v4l2_subdev *sd, *tmp;
> -     unsigned int notif_n_subdev = notifier->num_subdevs;
> -     unsigned int n_subdev = min(notif_n_subdev, V4L2_MAX_SUBDEVS);
> +     unsigned int notif_n_subdev = 0;
> +     unsigned int n_subdev;
> +     struct list_head *list;
>       struct device **dev;
>       int i = 0;
>  
> @@ -218,6 +273,10 @@ void v4l2_async_notifier_unregister(struct 
> v4l2_async_notifier *notifier)
>  
>       list_del(&notifier->list);
>  
> +     list_for_each(list, &notifier->done)
> +             ++notif_n_subdev;
> +     n_subdev = min(notif_n_subdev, V4L2_MAX_SUBDEVS);
> +

Shouldn't this change go to a separate patch? It seems unrelated.

>       list_for_each_entry_safe(sd, tmp, &notifier->done, async_list) {
>               struct device *d;
>  
> @@ -294,8 +353,19 @@ int v4l2_async_register_subdev(struct v4l2_subdev *sd)
>       list_for_each_entry(notifier, &notifier_list, list) {
>               struct v4l2_async_subdev *asd = v4l2_async_belongs(notifier, 
> sd);
>               if (asd) {
> +                     struct list_head *tail = notifier->waiting.prev;
>                       int ret = v4l2_async_test_notify(notifier, sd, asd);
> +
> +                     /*
> +                      * If entries were added to the notifier waiting list,
> +                      * check if the corresponding subdevices are already
> +                      * available.
> +                      */
> +                     if (tail != notifier->waiting.prev)
> +                             ret = v4l2_async_test_notify_all(notifier);
> +
>                       mutex_unlock(&list_lock);
> +
>                       return ret;
>               }
>       }
> diff --git a/include/media/v4l2-async.h b/include/media/v4l2-async.h
> index 8e2a236..e4e4b11 100644
> --- a/include/media/v4l2-async.h
> +++ b/include/media/v4l2-async.h
> @@ -114,6 +114,18 @@ int v4l2_async_notifier_register(struct v4l2_device 
> *v4l2_dev,
>                                struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier);
>  
>  /**
> + * __v4l2_async_notifier_add_subdev - adds a subdevice to the notifier 
> waitlist
> + *
> + * @v4l2_notifier: notifier the calling subdev is bound to

s/v4l2_//

> + * @asd: asynchronous subdev match
> + *
> + * To be called from inside a subdevices' registered_async callback to add
> + * additional subdevices to the notifier waiting list.
> + */
> +int __v4l2_async_notifier_add_subdev(struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier,
> +                                  struct v4l2_async_subdev *asd);
> +
> +/**
>   * v4l2_async_notifier_unregister - unregisters a subdevice asynchronous 
> notifier
>   *
>   * @notifier: pointer to &struct v4l2_async_notifier

-- 
Kind regards,

Sakari Ailus
e-mail: sakari.ai...@iki.fi     XMPP: sai...@retiisi.org.uk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to