I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the 
corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.

Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng....@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex...@intel.com>
---
 drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stb6100.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stb6100.c 
b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stb6100.c
index b9c2511..834d35f 100644
--- a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stb6100.c
+++ b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stb6100.c
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
 #include "stb6100.h"
 
 static unsigned int verbose;
-module_param(verbose, int, 0644);
+module_param(verbose, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 
 /* Max transfer size done by I2C transfer functions */
 #define MAX_XFER_SIZE  64
-- 
2.9.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to