I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the 
corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.

Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng....@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex...@intel.com>
---
 drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stb0899_drv.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stb0899_drv.c 
b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stb0899_drv.c
index 3d171b0..99de421 100644
--- a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stb0899_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stb0899_drv.c
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
 #define MAX_XFER_SIZE  64
 
 static unsigned int verbose = 0;//1;
-module_param(verbose, int, 0644);
+module_param(verbose, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 
 /* C/N in dB/10, NIRM/NIRL */
 static const struct stb0899_tab stb0899_cn_tab[] = {
-- 
2.9.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to