Dear Guennadi > I'll hold off on both these SOCAM_FIELD_ID_* patches until we have > clarified this, ok?
I'm so sorry for very slowly response. > like with other control signals, where if both partners are freely > configurable, then any polarity can be used; if one is configurable and > another is hard-wired, only one polarity can be used. (snip) > other words, is it a working configuration, when one of the partners > provides this signal and the other one doesn't? I guess it is, because, > you say, it is optional. So we shouldn't test it in > soc_camera_bus_param_compatible()? I think this problem is quite difficult for me. Magnus, can you answer this question ? Best regards -- Kuninori Morimoto -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
