2.6.32-longterm review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Ralf Baechle <[email protected]>

commit d496f7842aada20c61e6044b3395383fa972872c upstream.

A ROSE socket doesn't necessarily always have a neighbour pointer so check
if the neighbour pointer is valid before dereferencing it.

Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Bernard Pidoux <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 8bbe4f448c01949084ef404eded3622086f052a6)

Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <[email protected]>
---
 net/rose/af_rose.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/rose/af_rose.c b/net/rose/af_rose.c
index 7119ea6..4457e9a 100644
--- a/net/rose/af_rose.c
+++ b/net/rose/af_rose.c
@@ -194,7 +194,8 @@ static void rose_kill_by_device(struct net_device *dev)
 
                if (rose->device == dev) {
                        rose_disconnect(s, ENETUNREACH, ROSE_OUT_OF_ORDER, 0);
-                       rose->neighbour->use--;
+                       if (rose->neighbour)
+                               rose->neighbour->use--;
                        rose->device = NULL;
                }
        }
-- 
1.7.12.2.21.g234cd45.dirty



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to