On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 11:34:20 +0530
Pratyush Anand <[email protected]> wrote:

> TP_printk() for svc_xprt_dequeue intends to print address of
> xprt->xpt_remote, however it prints address of another structure where
> xprt->xpt_remote has been copied.
> 
> This patch fixes the above behaviour.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pratyush Anand <[email protected]>
> ---
>  include/trace/events/sunrpc.h | 10 +++++-----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/trace/events/sunrpc.h b/include/trace/events/sunrpc.h
> index 937e482d80e9..37b6af1a911a 100644
> --- a/include/trace/events/sunrpc.h
> +++ b/include/trace/events/sunrpc.h
> @@ -556,19 +556,19 @@ TRACE_EVENT(svc_xprt_dequeue,
>  
>       TP_STRUCT__entry(
>               __field(struct svc_xprt *, xprt)
> -             __field_struct(struct sockaddr_storage, ss)
> +             __field(struct sockaddr *, addr)
>               __field(unsigned long, flags)
>       ),
>  
>       TP_fast_assign(
> -             __entry->xprt = xprt,
> -             xprt ? memcpy(&__entry->ss, &xprt->xpt_remote, 
> sizeof(__entry->ss)) : memset(&__entry->ss, 0, sizeof(__entry->ss));
> +             __entry->xprt = xprt;
> +             __entry->addr =
> +                     xprt ? (struct sockaddr *)&xprt->xpt_remote : NULL;

NAK, this is wrong. %pIScp will dereference that address so you don't
want to pass a NULL pointer to it. We do want to save a copy of the
sockaddr.

>               __entry->flags = xprt ? xprt->xpt_flags : 0;
>       ),
>  
>       TP_printk("xprt=0x%p addr=%pIScp flags=%s", __entry->xprt,
> -             (struct sockaddr *)&__entry->ss,
> -             show_svc_xprt_flags(__entry->flags))
> +             __entry->addr, show_svc_xprt_flags(__entry->flags))
>  );
>  
>  TRACE_EVENT(svc_wake_up,


-- 
Jeff Layton <[email protected]>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to