On 05/12/2015 12:38 PM, Michael Welling wrote:
> GPIO chip select patch series appears to have broken the native chip select
> support. This patch pulls the manual native chip select toggling out of
> the transfer_one routine and adds a set_cs routine.
> 
> Tested natively on AM3354 with SPI serial flash on spi0cs0.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael Welling <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/spi/spi-omap2-mcspi.c |   33 +++++++++++----------------------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-omap2-mcspi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-omap2-mcspi.c
> index 90cf7e7..a7d85c5 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-omap2-mcspi.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-omap2-mcspi.c
> @@ -243,17 +243,20 @@ static void omap2_mcspi_set_enable(const struct 
> spi_device *spi, int enable)
>       mcspi_read_cs_reg(spi, OMAP2_MCSPI_CHCTRL0);
>  }
>  
> -static void omap2_mcspi_force_cs(struct spi_device *spi, int cs_active)
> +static void omap2_mcspi_set_cs(struct spi_device *spi, bool enable)
>  {
>       u32 l;
>  
> -     l = mcspi_cached_chconf0(spi);
> -     if (cs_active)
> -             l |= OMAP2_MCSPI_CHCONF_FORCE;
> -     else
> -             l &= ~OMAP2_MCSPI_CHCONF_FORCE;
> +     if (spi->controller_state) {
> +             l = mcspi_cached_chconf0(spi);
>  
> -     mcspi_write_chconf0(spi, l);
> +             if (enable)
> +                     l &= ~OMAP2_MCSPI_CHCONF_FORCE;
> +             else
> +                     l |= OMAP2_MCSPI_CHCONF_FORCE;
> +
> +             mcspi_write_chconf0(spi, l);
> +     }
>  }
>  
>  static void omap2_mcspi_set_master_mode(struct spi_master *master)
> @@ -1075,7 +1078,6 @@ static int omap2_mcspi_work_one(struct omap2_mcspi 
> *mcspi,
>  
>       struct spi_master               *master;
>       struct omap2_mcspi_dma          *mcspi_dma;
> -     int                             cs_active = 0;
>       struct omap2_mcspi_cs           *cs;
>       struct omap2_mcspi_device_config *cd;
>       int                             par_override = 0;
> @@ -1118,11 +1120,6 @@ static int omap2_mcspi_work_one(struct omap2_mcspi 
> *mcspi,
>                       mcspi_read_cs_reg(spi, OMAP2_MCSPI_MODULCTRL);
>       }
>  
> -     if (!cs_active) {
> -             omap2_mcspi_force_cs(spi, 1);
> -             cs_active = 1;
> -     }
> -
>       chconf = mcspi_cached_chconf0(spi);
>       chconf &= ~OMAP2_MCSPI_CHCONF_TRM_MASK;
>       chconf &= ~OMAP2_MCSPI_CHCONF_TURBO;
> @@ -1169,12 +1166,6 @@ static int omap2_mcspi_work_one(struct omap2_mcspi 
> *mcspi,
>       if (t->delay_usecs)
>               udelay(t->delay_usecs);
>  
> -     /* ignore the "leave it on after last xfer" hint */
> -     if (t->cs_change) {
> -             omap2_mcspi_force_cs(spi, 0);
> -             cs_active = 0;
> -     }
> -
>       omap2_mcspi_set_enable(spi, 0);
>  
>       if (mcspi->fifo_depth > 0)
> @@ -1187,9 +1178,6 @@ out:
>               status = omap2_mcspi_setup_transfer(spi, NULL);
>       }
>  
> -     if (cs_active)
> -             omap2_mcspi_force_cs(spi, 0);
> -
>       if (cd && cd->cs_per_word) {
>               chconf = mcspi->ctx.modulctrl;
>               chconf |= OMAP2_MCSPI_MODULCTRL_SINGLE;
> @@ -1334,6 +1322,7 @@ static int omap2_mcspi_probe(struct platform_device 
> *pdev)
>       master->setup = omap2_mcspi_setup;
>       master->auto_runtime_pm = true;
>       master->transfer_one = omap2_mcspi_transfer_one;
> +     master->set_cs = omap2_mcspi_set_cs;
>       master->cleanup = omap2_mcspi_cleanup;
>       master->dev.of_node = node;
>       master->max_speed_hz = OMAP2_MCSPI_MAX_FREQ;
> 

Tested on next-20150512
http://paste.ubuntu.org.cn/2600748
Since the original issue was reported by me in
http://marc.info/?t=143136312900001&r=1&w=2
Reported-by: Nishanth Menon <[email protected]>

Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <[email protected]>

-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to