On 2015/4/2 16:12, Namhyung Kim wrote: > On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 06:04:52AM +0000, Wang Nan wrote: >> There is a bug in perf annotate that it doesn't respect user provided >> '-i'/'--input' option: >> >> # perf record ls >> [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ] >> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.001 MB perf.data (8 samples) ] >> # mv ./perf.data ./perf.data.new >> # perf annotate -i ./perf.data.new --stdio >> failed to open perf.data: No such file or directory (try 'perf record' >> first) >> >> This patch fix it by setting file path after option parsing, like >> what 'perf report' does. >> >> Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <[email protected]> > > I guess other commands are also suffered from this bug.. anyway, > > Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]> > > Thanks, > Namhyung >
Hi, Looks like the next patch 'perf kmem: Respect -i option' has already been collected by tip/master, but this patch is lost. Is there any problem? Thank you! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
