Group,
As a contractor or employee, the code that I write while being
employed by them is owned by the company that I work for.
It is then up to them / legal / management, etc whether they
offer that code implementation to kernel.org or a ISP, insert it into their
release, or whatever….
My notification is to say here is a minimal TOI, explain
additionally where necessary, that I never saw a patch offered, it exists, and
I would be willing to repeat the code with a different implementation for FREE
as an individual.
If the code is within a networking area, then maybe a
simple Request For Enhancement (RFE) that explains functionality, probably some
minimal API, but the direction is NOT to offer an implementation of code.
Thus,,,, is just a legal statement that needs repeating each
and every time that make my offer.
How rude is that?
Thus, Mike ,, your statement is totally uncalled for,
inappropriate… and that being behind a email address does not excuse that.
Mitchell Erblich
Kernel Engineer
On Mar 18, 2015, at 8:59 PM, Mike Galbraith <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-03-18 at 20:43 -0700, Mitchell Erblich wrote:
>
>> This proposal was ONLY to resolve the legal issue with public domain
>> code of notification when a patch was not offered.…
>
> Ah, so completely off topic here.. but then you knew that. How rude.
>
> -Mike
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
