On Mar 9, 2015 8:20 AM, "Boaz Harrosh" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 03/06/2015 01:03 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > <> > > > > I think it would be nice to have control over the caching mode. > > Depending on the application, WT or UC could make more sense. > > > > Patches are welcome. say > map=sss@aaa:WT,sss@aaa:CA, ... > > But for us, with direct_access(), all benchmarks show a slight advantage > for the cached mode.
I'm sure cached is faster. The question is: who flushes the cache? --Andy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
