Commit-ID:  139b6fd26d85a65c4e0d2795b87b94f9505e5943
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/139b6fd26d85a65c4e0d2795b87b94f9505e5943
Author:     Sharon Dvir <[email protected]>
AuthorDate: Sun, 1 Feb 2015 23:47:32 +0200
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
CommitDate: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 07:52:33 +0100

sched/Documentation: Remove unneeded word

The second 'mutex' shouldn't be there, it can't be about the mutex,
as the mutex can't be freed, but unlocked, the memory where the
mutex resides however, can be freed.

Signed-off-by: Sharon Dvir <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Link: 
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
---
 kernel/locking/mutex.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex.c b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
index 4541951..5b49f65 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/mutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ __visible void __sched __mutex_lock_slowpath(atomic_t 
*lock_count);
  * The mutex must later on be released by the same task that
  * acquired it. Recursive locking is not allowed. The task
  * may not exit without first unlocking the mutex. Also, kernel
- * memory where the mutex resides mutex must not be freed with
+ * memory where the mutex resides must not be freed with
  * the mutex still locked. The mutex must first be initialized
  * (or statically defined) before it can be locked. memset()-ing
  * the mutex to 0 is not allowed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to