* Xishi Qiu <[email protected]> wrote:
> The type of "MAX_DMA_PFN" and "xXx_pfn" are both unsigned long now, so use
> min() instead of min_t().
>
> Signed-off-by: Xishi Qiu <[email protected]>
> Suggested-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/e820.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
> index 49f8864..dd2f07a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
> @@ -1114,8 +1114,8 @@ void __init memblock_find_dma_reserve(void)
> * at first, and assume boot_mem will not take below MAX_DMA_PFN
> */
> for_each_mem_pfn_range(i, MAX_NUMNODES, &start_pfn, &end_pfn, NULL) {
> - start_pfn = min_t(unsigned long, start_pfn, MAX_DMA_PFN);
> - end_pfn = min_t(unsigned long, end_pfn, MAX_DMA_PFN);
> + start_pfn = min(start_pfn, MAX_DMA_PFN);
> + end_pfn = min(end_pfn, MAX_DMA_PFN);
> nr_pages += end_pfn - start_pfn;
Yes, harmonizing the types is a much nicer solution, it allows
cleanups like this.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
