On Thursday, June 12, 2014 04:58:13 PM Josef Gajdusek wrote:
> It seems that some batteries (noticed on DELL JYPJ136) assume 
> capacity_now = design_capacity when fully charged. This causes 
> reported capacity to suddenly jump to >full_charge_capacity (and that 
> means capacity reported to userspace is >100% and incorrect) 
> values after 99%. This patch attempts to detect this bug and trims 
> capacity_now properly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Josef Gajdusek <[email protected]>
> ---
> Oops, I forgot to sign the previous one.
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/battery.c b/drivers/acpi/battery.c
> index e48fc98..3338dd5 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/battery.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/battery.c
> @@ -532,6 +532,14 @@ static int acpi_battery_get_state(struct acpi_battery 
> *battery)
>                       " invalid.\n");
>       }
>  
> +     /* When fully charged, some batteries wrongly report
> +      * capacity_now = design_capacity instead of = full_charge_capacity
> +      */
> +     if (battery->capacity_now == battery->design_capacity &&

Why don't you use the

        battery->capacity_now > battery->full_charge_capacity

check here?  That would be more robust, wouldn't it?

> +         battery->full_charge_capacity != ACPI_BATTERY_VALUE_UNKNOWN)
> +             battery->capacity_now = battery->full_charge_capacity;
> +
> +
>       if (test_bit(ACPI_BATTERY_QUIRK_PERCENTAGE_CAPACITY, &battery->flags)
>           && battery->capacity_now >= 0 && battery->capacity_now <= 100)
>               battery->capacity_now = (battery->capacity_now *
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to