On Wed, 4 Jun 2014 19:15:06 -0400 J__rn Engel <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 28 April 2014 17:22:19 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 19:40:39 -0400 J__rn Engel <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Thu, 24 April 2014 15:40:24 -0400, J__rn Engel wrote: > > > > On Wed, 23 April 2014 20:52:47 -0400, J__rn Engel wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I use the patch below for some time now. While it doesn't avoid the > > > > > log pollution in the first place, it lessens the impact somewhat. > > > > > > > > Added a config option and ported it to current -linus. Andrew, would > > > > you take this patch? > > > > > > Andrew? Did you dislike this patch for some reason or just miss it in > > > the thread? > > > > Neither ;) I try to respond in some way to all patches unless I think it's > > clear > > to the originator why I took no action. And I think I'm pretty good at > > not losing stuff. > > > > otoh, it has only been four days, three of which I spent offline... > > Ping. It is closer to 40 days now. Can I fault this patch back into > your memory? > Sorry, it seems I'm better at losing stuff than I thought I was. I've restored the patch to the input queue. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
