(2014/03/22 6:39), Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
>> index 79a3f96..b482e96 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
>> @@ -897,9 +897,7 @@ int __kprobes kprobe_fault_handler(struct pt_regs *regs,
>> int trapnr)
>> struct kprobe *cur = kprobe_running();
>> struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
>>
>> - switch (kcb->kprobe_status) {
>> - case KPROBE_HIT_SS:
>> - case KPROBE_REENTER:
>> + if (unlikely(regs->ip == (unsigned long)cur->ainsn.insn)) {
>
> I wonder if we should add a:
>
> WARN_ON(kcb->kprobe_status != KPROBE_HIT_SS &&
> kcb->kprobe_status != KPROBE_REENTER);
Ah, right. I'll add it for verifying the status.
Thanks!
--
Masami HIRAMATSU
IT Management Research Dept. Linux Technology Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: [email protected]
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
