On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Ezequiel Garcia <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Grant, Boris: > > (BTW, dropped Russell, Rob Landley and some unrelated mailing lists from Cc, > and added Thomas, Gregory and Rob Herring). > > On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 02:34:44PM +0100, Boris BREZILLON wrote: >> On 05/02/2014 12:15, Grant Likely wrote: >> > On Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:53:32 -0300, Ezequiel Garcia >> > <[email protected]> wrote: > [..] >> >> >> >> Maybe we can discuss about it now? >> >> >> >> nand-ecc-strength : integer ECC required strength. >> >> nand-ecc-size : integer step size associated to the ECC strength. >> > I'm okay with either, but the above binding is indeed more readable. >> >> That's fine by me, if everybody agrees, let's go for the >> nand-ecc-strength/nand-ecc-size couple then. >> > > Great. So, if some DT dictator^C^Cmaintainers can Ack this binding, > I can send a new patchset, with pxa3xx-nand using it... > >> I'll rebase next version of my series on Ezequiel's patch providing >> these OF helpers. >> > > ... and then you can base on it? > > This is the original patchset: > > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.devicetree/58764 > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.devicetree/58763
I've looked at both. Go ahead and add my a-b line: Acked-by: Grant Likely <[email protected]> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
