This fixes two spelling mistakes in the design pattern doc.
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
---
Documentation/driver-model/design-patterns.txt | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/driver-model/design-patterns.txt
b/Documentation/driver-model/design-patterns.txt
index 9ef8c1684558..ba7b2df64904 100644
--- a/Documentation/driver-model/design-patterns.txt
+++ b/Documentation/driver-model/design-patterns.txt
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ your interrupt handler.
2. container_of()
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-Continuing on the above example we add a offloaded work:
+Continuing on the above example we add an offloaded work:
struct foo {
spinlock_t lock;
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ static int foo_probe(...)
(...)
}
-The design pattern is the same for a a hrtimer or something similar that will
+The design pattern is the same for an hrtimer or something similar that will
return a single argument which is a pointer to a struct member in the
callback.
--
1.8.3.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
