On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 06:16:42PM +0000, Anna, Suman wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > This is an updated series addressing the review comments from the > > v2 series. The hwmod patches have been dropped from the repost > > as per Paul's request, they have already been queued. > > Mark,
Hi Suman, > > Any comments on this series? Tony has picked up the OMAP DTS patches for > 3.13, and so > the "ti,omap4-hwspinlock" compatible string is showing up as > undocumented in linux-next. > How do you want me to proceed here? I will be separating out the > bindings into separate patches > in the future. The only thing I note that I'm not so keen on is that the hwlock-specifier is always one cell, rather than using a #hwlock-cells property on the provider (even if we required it to be <1> for the moment and just failed if it wasn't). If possible, I would like an amendment to always use #hwlock-cells, but otherwise this looks fine to me. Feel free to add my Ack: Acked-by: Mark Rutland <[email protected]> Thanks, Mark. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
