Hi Victor, On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 07:05:54PM -0300, Victor N. Ramos Mello wrote: > From: "Victor N. Ramos Mello" <[email protected]> > > Fix a possible memory leak in sun4i_osc_clk_setup(). > Moved clock-frequency check to save superfluous allocation. > > Signed-off-by: Victor N. Ramos Mello <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c | 16 +++++++++------- > 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c > index 34ee69f..a741770 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c > @@ -38,18 +38,16 @@ static void __init sun4i_osc_clk_setup(struct device_node > *node) > const char *clk_name = node->name; > u32 rate; > > + if (of_property_read_u32(node, "clock-frequency", &rate)) > + return; > + > /* allocate fixed-rate and gate clock structs */ > fixed = kzalloc(sizeof(struct clk_fixed_rate), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!fixed) > return; > gate = kzalloc(sizeof(struct clk_gate), GFP_KERNEL); > - if (!gate) { > - kfree(fixed); > - return; > - } > - > - if (of_property_read_u32(node, "clock-frequency", &rate)) > - return; > + if (!gate) > + goto err_gate; > > /* set up gate and fixed rate properties */ > gate->reg = of_iomap(node, 0); > @@ -67,7 +65,11 @@ static void __init sun4i_osc_clk_setup(struct device_node > *node) > if (!IS_ERR(clk)) { > of_clk_add_provider(node, of_clk_src_simple_get, clk); > clk_register_clkdev(clk, clk_name, NULL); > + return; > } > + kfree(gate); > +err_gate: > + kfree(fixed);
While the patch is appreciated, I find the logic here a bit backward
compared to what's usually done.
I'd rather see here something like
if (IS_ERR(clk))
goto err_gate;
of_clk_add_provider(...);
clk_register_clkdev(...);
return;
err_gate:
kfree(gate);
err_fixed:
kfree(fixed);
But maybe it's just me.
Thanks!
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

