On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 13:10 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Fully agreed, this is something we should do regardless -- for as long > as we preserve the avg_idle() machinery anyway :-)
Okay, I'll have the avg_idle fix as part 1 of the v4 patchset. > The thing you 'forgot' to mention is if this patch actually helps you > workload? Yes, this helps a lot of the workloads on the 8 socket machines. I will be sure to include some numbers next time. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
