On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:34 AM, Ferre, Nicolas <[email protected]> wrote: > >>On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 12:47:47AM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote: >>> Arnd, Olof, >>> >>> Additional pull-request for AT91 DT patches. >>> It contains the remaining part of the USB gadget pull-request that I sent >>> you >>> last week. After having split it, here is the DT part. >>> It also contains the update of DMA bindings: it is the AT91 part the should >>> go >>> through arm-soc. I have included the patch (ARM: at91: dt: add header to >>> define >>> at_hdmac configuration) so that we avoid build errors whichever git tree >>> (slave-dma or arm-soc) is merged first. >>> A SPI DT patch for at91sam9x5 is also added. >>> >>> Thanks, best regards, >>> >>> The following changes since commit 028633c238f91dc113520a7ad25d37b2ba9068af: >>> >>> ARM: at91/dt: add pinctrl definition for at91 tc blocks (2013-05-31 >>> 22:40:37 +0200) >>> >>> are available in the git repository at: >>> >>> git://github.com/at91linux/linux-at91.git tags/at91-dt >> >>Pulled, thanks. > > Hi, > > I do not see it appearing in arm-soc/at91/dt branch even though is it present > in arm-soc/for-next: is it normal?
I had missed to push that (and the driver branch) up. They are there now, as at91/dt2 and at91/drivers. Fixed the bad branch name in arm-soc-for-next-contents.txt as well. -Olof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
