On Tue, 14 May 2013 16:38:38 +0400 Andrey Vagin <[email protected]> wrote:

> struct memcg_cache_params has a union. Different parts of this union are
> used for root and non-root caches. A part with destroying work is used only
> for non-root caches.

That union is a bit dangerous.  Perhaps it would be better to do
something like

--- a/include/linux/slab.h~a
+++ a/include/linux/slab.h
@@ -337,15 +337,17 @@ static __always_inline int kmalloc_size(
 struct memcg_cache_params {
        bool is_root_cache;
        union {
-               struct kmem_cache *memcg_caches[0];
-               struct {
+               struct memcg_root_cache {
+                       struct kmem_cache *caches[0];
+               } memcg_root_cache;
+               struct memcg_child_cache {
                        struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
                        struct list_head list;
                        struct kmem_cache *root_cache;
                        bool dead;
                        atomic_t nr_pages;
                        struct work_struct destroy;
-               };
+               } memcg_child_cache;
        };
 };

And then adopt the convention of selecting either memcg_root_cache or
memcg_child_cache at the highest level then passing the more strongly
typed pointer to callees.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to