On Thursday 18 April 2013, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > > This patch blindly removes the warning and changes the > > at91sam9263 to use the same code at at91sam9g45, which > > may or may not be the right solution. If it is not, > > maybe someone could provide a better fix. > > Maybe you can remove this paragraph: now you are using the proper fix > with proper RAM type. > > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> > > Cc: Nicolas Ferre <[email protected]> > > Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <[email protected]> > > What is the future of this patch series: do you want us to take this > patch separately or to you want to apply the whole series on the arm-soc > tree?
I'd prefer if you could just apply or forward it to an appropriate tree. Most of the other patches have found their way into mainline by now. > > Cc: Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <[email protected]> > > Cc: Andrew Victor <[email protected]> > > Cc: Albin Tonnerre <[email protected]> > > Cc: Daniel Lezcano <[email protected]> > > Moreover, this patch my conflict with Daniel's current initiative to > move cpuidle driver to its own directory: how do we coordinate with each > other? Maybe you can make sure it actually works and send it to Daniel to apply on top of his other patches? Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
