On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 09:38:55AM +0900, Jonghwan Choi wrote: > 3.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
Ok, I object, given that I told you to change the format of the message you send out. Please look at how others on the stable@ mailing list send "should this patch be applied" messages, and copy how that is done. > ------------------ > > From: "Richard Guy Briggs <[email protected]>" > > commit da28d966f6aa942ae836d09729f76a1647932309 upstream. > > The return code from the registration of the thermal class is used to > unallocate resources, but this failure isn't passed back to the caller of > thermal_init. Return this failure back to the caller. > > This bug was introduced in changeset 4cb18728 which overwrote the return > code > when the variable was re-used to catch the return code of the registration > of > the genetlink thermal socket family. You linewrapped the patch message, careful, you might mess up the patch itself as well :( > Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <[email protected]> You aren't signing off on it as well? Why not? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
